Guide to Successful Practice of MES System for Electronic Components Enterprises
Date:2025-10-11 Views:130
With the development and progress of technology, MES systems have evolved from being an "optional upgrade" in the electronic component manufacturing industry to a "must-have for survival." However, MES solutions on the
market are a mixed bag. Some enterprises have invested millions but found themselves in the predicament of "the system and production operating in two separate worlds," while others have seen their upgrades aborted halfway
due to selection biases. A truly successful digital transformation begins with precise selection, is achieved through in-depth implementation, and ends with continuous optimization.
1. Cognition First: The "Three Major Cognitive Misconceptions" in MES Selection for Electronic Component Enterprises Before launching the MES project, many enterprises often plant the seeds of failure due to cognitive biases regarding industry characteristics and system value. Clarifying these common misconceptions is the first step towards
successful system selection.
· Misconception 1: "A generic MES can adapt to all production scenarios" The manufacturing of electronic components involves various distinct production models, with the required control precision of process parameters ranging from micrometers to nanometers. Generic MES lacks industry-specific
modules; if forced to adapt, customizing process templates alone would require an additional cost of over 30%, and it would be difficult to meet core requirements such as sintering curve control and dielectric coating precision
monitoring. A certain enterprise once introduced a generic MES for the electronics industry but was ultimately forced to make a second investment to replace the system due to its inability to adapt to the production control of
the lamination process. · Misconception 2: "The more comprehensive the functions, the better; build the platform in one go." Some enterprises pursue "large and comprehensive" system functions, incorporating modules such as Facility Management, Energy Management and Control, and Supply Chain Collaboration all at once, while neglecting their
own informatization foundation. If small and medium-sized enterprises in the electronic components industry skip the stages of basic Data Acquisition and process standardization and directly implement complex modules, it will
lead to serious data fragmentation and the system utilization rate will be less than 40%. The correct path should be "core first, gradual expansion", prioritizing the resolution of pain points in process interconnection and quality
traceability. · Misconception 3: "Focusing solely on software functionality while neglecting service capabilities" The implementation of MES is a dual project of "technology + service". The production process of electronic components iterates rapidly, with frequent new material introductions and new specification pilot runs, requiring suppliers
to provide continuous process template updates and system optimization services. If only software functionality is focused on while ignoring the supplier's industry experience, the system may stagnate after going live due to its
inability to adapt to the production requirements of new capacitors. For example, a film capacitor enterprise once encountered a situation where the system could not effectively monitor evaporation parameters because the supplier
did not understand the coating process. Selection Practice: The "Five-Dimensional Evaluation System" of Electronic Component MES Combining the characteristics of the electronic components industry with the laws of digital transformation, enterprises can precisely identify suitable solutions through a five-dimensional system of "demand definition - supplier
screening - solution verification - value accounting - risk management and control".
1. Requirement Definition: Draw up an "inelastic demand list" and reject vague requirements: Form a cross-functional team composed of production, technology, quality, and IT departments, conduct a full-process investigation lasting
1-2 weeks, and output a clear list of requirements. 2. Supplier Screening: Focus on "Industry DNA" and Eliminate Outsiders: Initially screen suppliers through channels such as peer recommendations and industry exhibitions, with a focus on examining three core capabilities - industry
experience; technical compatibility; service responsiveness 3. Solution Verification: On-site Measurement, Rejecting "Arming Chair Tactics": Invite 2-3 shortlisted suppliers to conduct on-site research and solution demonstrations, 4. Value Accounting: Quantify Returns and Ensure Investment Controllability 5. Risk Management: Anticipate potential hazards and develop contingency plans 2. Key to Implementation: The "Three-Stage Implementation Method" of Capacitor MES Successful model selection is only the starting point; a scientific implementation rhythm determines whether the value of the system can be fully realized. Adopting the three-stage implementation method of "foundation building - pilot
run - full-scale promotion" can achieve a smooth rollout. Phase 1: Foundation Building (1-2 months) Complete system deployment, device networking, and basic data configuration. Core tasks include: · Deploy edge gateways and acquisition modules to achieve data access for over 80% of key devices; · Imported basic data such as material BOM, process routes, inspection standards, etc., and established over 20 core process templates; · Completed the development of basic interfaces with ERP and WMS systems, achieving synchronization of production plans and inventory data. Phase 2: Pilot Run (1 month) Select a typical production line (such as the MLCC sintering production line) for a pilot project. Focus on conducting: · Quality control practice run: Implement full-process digital inspection of IQC-IPQC-OQC, and compare the consistency between system data and paper records; · Rapid iteration of issues: A recap meeting is held weekly to address issues such as equipment data latency and cumbersome operation interfaces, with the system adaptability increased to over 95%. Phase 3: Full-scale Promotion (1-2 months) Completed the system launch and capability deepening across the entire workshop: · Gradually expand to all production lines, achieving 100% equipment networking rate and ensuring that process templates cover all product categories; · Conduct full-staff competency certification, establish system operation and maintenance specifications, and develop a continuous optimization mechanism. III. Conclusion There is no "one-size-fits-all answer" in the digital transformation of the electronic components industry, only "tailored solutions". From clearly defining requirements to scientifically selecting and evaluating, from steadily implementing
in stages to continuously optimizing and iterating, every step must closely align with industry characteristics and enterprise realities. When the MES system truly integrates into every process of electrode preparation, dielectric coating,
and sintering empowerment, becoming the "nerve center" that connects equipment, processes, and quality, electronic components enterprises can gain a firm foothold in the micron competition and achieve a qualitative leap on the
high-end manufacturing track.
